Stepanov O.

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of KhNADU, Kharkiv

Yarmak T.

Phd Sociology of KhNADU, Kharkiv

Venger A.

Postgraduate student of KhNADU, Kharkiv

Traffic conflict

DOI: 10.52363/2414-5866-2021-1-6

Ключові слова: psychology, driver, road users, traffic conflict, car

  

Анотація
The article is devoted to the conceptual consideration of the formation and development of the theory of transport conflicts in the transport process. The early studies of transport conflicts by foreign scientists are shown. The authors come to the conclusion that traffic conflicts depend on the psychophysiology of road users, which must be taken into account in the psychology of traffic conflicts.

Посилання

 

  1. Babkov V.F. Dorozhnye usloviya i bezopasnost dvizheniya: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: Transport, 1993. 272 s.
  2. Lobanov E.M. Proektirovanie dorog i organizaciya dvizheniya s uchetom psihofiziologii voditelya. M.: Transport, 1980. 310 s.
  3. Plotnikov A.M. Algoritmy i tehnicheskie sredstva povysheniya bezopasnosti dvizheniya na reguliruemyh perehrestkah. Transport Rossijskoj federacii. 2011. №5 (36). S. 28–30
  4. Sidenko, V.M. Kompleksnyj metod ocenki bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya / V.M. Sidenko, A.A. Rybalchenko // Avtodorozhnik Ukrainy: nauch.-teh. sbornik. 1978. №3. – S. 42–43.5. Allen, B.L. Analysis of traffic conflicts and collisions / B.L. Allen, B.T. Shin, P.J. Cooper. Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton.
  5. Amundsen, F.H.E. Proceeding of First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts /F.H.E Amundsen, C. Hyden. Institution of Transport Economics. Oslo/Lund Institute of Technology. Oslo. 1977.
  6. Archer, J. Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application in micro-simulation modelling: A study of urban and suburban intersections / J. Archer, J. Doctoral Dissertation Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden 2005. 273 p.
  7. Cunto, F.J.C. Assessing Safety Performance of Transportation Systems using Microscopic Simulation / F.J.C. Cunto. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2008. 190 p.
  8. Forbes, T.W. Analysis of near-accident reports. HRB Bull. 152 /T.W. Forbes // Transportation Res. Bd. –1957. 23-35pp.
  9. Grayson, G.B. The Malmo Study: A calibration of Traffic Conflict Techniques / G.B. Grayson. Report R-84-12. Institute for Road Safety Reaserch SWOV, Leidschendam. 1984.
  10. Hayward, J.Ch. Near miss determination through use of a scale of danger / J.Ch. Hayward. Report no. TTSC 7115. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania. 1972.
  11. Horst, A.R.A. van der. A Time-based analisis of road user behaviour in normal and critical encounters / A.R.A. van der Horst. Delft University of Technology. 1990. 183 p.
  12. Hyden, Ch. The development of a method for traffic safety evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique / Ch. Hyden // Bulletin 70, University of Lund, Lund Institute of Technology, Dept. of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund. 1987
  13. Kraay, J.H. Manual conflict observation technique DOCTOR (Dutch Objective Conflict Technique for Operation and Research) / J.H. Kraay, A.R.A. van der Horst, S. Oppe. Foundation Road safety for all The Netherlands. 2013. 86 p.
  14. Kraay, J.H. Proceedings of the third international workshop on traffic conflicts techniques, organised by the international committee on traffic conflicts techniques ICTCT , Leidschendsm, The Netherlandes /J.H. Kraay. Institute for Road Safety Research SWOV, The Netherlands. April 1982, 98 p.
  15. McFarland, R.A. Human Factors in Highway Transport Safety. / R. McFarland, A.L. Moseley. Harvard School of Public Health. Boston. Mass., 1954.
  16. Minderhoud, M. M. Extended Time-to-Collision Measures for Road Traffic Safety Assessment / MM. Minderhoud, P.H.L. Bovy // Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol 33, pp.89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00019-1
  17. Oppe, S. The International Calibration of Conflicts: A Summary of the results / S. Oppe // In Proceeding of Workshop on Traffic Conflicts and Other Intermediate Measures in Safety Evaluation. September 8-10. Institute for Transport Sciences. – Budapest. 1986.
  18. Perkins, S.R. Traffic Conflict Characteristics – Accident 7. Potential at Intersections /S.R. Perkins, J. Harris. HRB Rec. 225. – Highway Res. Bd. – 1968. 35-44pp.
  19. Perkins, S.R. GMR Traffic Conflicts Procedures Manual / S.R. Perkins. GMR-895/ General Motors Research Publication, Aug., 1969.
  20. Perkins, S.R. Criteria for traffic conflict characteristics signalized intersection / S.R. Perkins, J.L. Harris. Rep№ GMR - 632. General Motors Corporation, Warren, Michigan. 1967. 22p.
  21. Várhelyi, A. Dynamic Speed Adaptation Based on Information Technology – A Theoretical Background / A. Várhelyi // Bulletin 142, Dept. of Traffic Planning and Engineering. – Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 1996.
  22. Williams, M.J. Validity of the traffic conflicts technique / M. J. Williams. Accid. Anal. & Prec. Vol. 13, pp. 133-145. 1981.